Just as a subgroup is a group within a group or a subfield is a field within a field, a submodule is a module within a module. That is, if is an
-module, we say that
is a submodule of
if
is a subgroup of
and is closed under multiplication by elements of
. This can be summarized by saying that for every
and every
, the following two properties hold.
In the case of groups, we could only form a quotient group if the subgroup we were modding out by as sufficiently “nice” (i.e., was a normal subgroup); likewise, in the case of rings we required that a subring be nice (an ideal) in order to form a quotient ring. With modules however, we can always form the quotient module with a submodule. We can do this since, as is an abelian group under addition, all subgroups are normal and we can form the quotient group
. This is naturally an abelian group, so in order to turn this into an
-module we have to define multiplication of elements in
and
, which we do in the most obvious way:
. To check that this is in fact an
-module, we simply verify that the three axioms of a module hold.
Finally, if is a unitary module, then so too is
:
.
We say a map between two
-modules is a homomorphism if
is a group homomorphism with the additional property that for each
,
. As you would expect, the kernel of this homomorphism is a submodule of
, and the image is a submodule of
.
Supposing that , we define
to be the smallest submodule of
containing
, which is naturally the intersection of all submodules containing
If is a finite set, we may write
in place of
, and in the event that
is a singleton, we say that
is a cyclic submodule of
. We call the elements of
the generating set of the
submodule, and call the elements of
the generators of this submodule.